Star Metro - Judge allows UK rugby brain injury court case to continue to trial

A mix of professional and amateur players claim World Rugby, the Welsh Rugby Union (WRU), England's Rugby Football Union (RFU), the Rugby Football League and the British Amateur Rugby League Association breached a duty of care to protect them from injury.

Last month, the presiding judge at London's High Court said he was deciding on whether to strike out 95 percent of the first batch of 561 claims on the grounds their lawyers failed to comply with a ruling to disclose all available documents relating to their neurological testing.

England rugby union World Cup winners Steve Thompson, Mark Regan and Phil Vickery and former Wales internationals Colin Charvis, Gavin Henson, Ryan Jones, Lee Byrne and Alix Popham are among the high-profile former players involved in the case.

They allege they have suffered a range of neurological conditions such as early onset dementia and CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy) because of repeated blows.

They argue the governing bodies had the knowledge and resources to understand the likelihood of brain damage, but did not take steps against this or inform the players.

Each of the governing bodies denies wrongdoing and is defending the legal claims.

Judge David Cook said Friday while he would have thrown out the claims, he decided "with some hesitation" they should proceed to trial, subject to "conditions" to be decided at a further hearing.

He added there were "exceptional circumstances" in the case and that it had a "particular element of public importance going beyond the individual claims".

"This litigation has the potential to greatly impact the way in which one of our national sports is conducted at amateur and professional levels," Cook said.

"I, of course, recognise the countervailing public interest that litigation should be conducted efficiently."

The players have since instructed a new law firm, KP Law.

Cook stressed the breach of the court orders had not been the fault of the players, saying: "Given the vulnerability of many of these claimants, it might be said that they should not be punished for the sins of their legal representative."

D.Ch. Nadeau--SMC